"Prevalence of middle crossed syndrome in young healthy individuals from a health science university in India".

BACKGROUND: A myofascial sling is a chain of anatomically interconnected muscles. Anatomical slings work by transferring forces between upper and lower limbs while maintaining a steady core. Middle Crossed Syndrome refers to an imbalance in the transverse plane musculature through sling systems of the trunk; often associated with laterality patterns. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to find the prevalence of Middle Crossed Syndrome(MCS) and secondary objective was to find an association of MCS with leg dominance in young healthy individuals. METHODS: This observational study, included 382 participants aged 19-26 years. The participants were screened for presence of Middle Crossed Syndrome using Supine Lateral Ball Roll Test, Active Straight Leg Raise and Gait Parameters (step length, stride length, degree of toe out, cadence, base of support). RESULTS: The results were obtained by statistical analysis using Chi-square test for prevalence of MCS in young healthy individuals with respect to age groups, gender and leg dominance. Of the total 382 screened, 25 (69.37%) were positive either unilaterally or bilaterally for MCS. CONCLUSION: The study concluded that over half of the participants clinically tested positive for MCS with no correltion of MCS with leg dominance.

Immediate effect of MWM adductor stretch, myofascial release, and conventional stretching in asymptomatic individuals with hip adductor tightness: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Hip adductors are the group of muscles that stabilize the pelvis during weight transfer in lower limbs in a gait cycle. As the full range of motion is seldomly used, this group of muscles commonly go into tightness which in turn may be a predisposing factor in development of back pain and knee pain. METHODS: 54 healthy individuals were selected after screening for bilateral hip adductor tightness by measuring hip abduction range of motion using goniometer. They were randomized to either mobilization with movement (MWM) adductor stretch, myofascial release, or conventional stretching group. All subjects were assessed pre and post intervention. Outcome measure used were hip abduction range of motion and bent knee fall out test. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference was noted between the experimental and the control group in terms of hip abduction range of motion and bent knee fall out test. CONCLUSION: Intervention showed significant results in all three groups; however, MWM adductor stretch when used in conjunction with conventional stretching has proved to be more effective than myofascial release with foam roller and conventional stretching in increasing the abduction range of motion and bent knee fall out test.